Analysis of justice in Accessibility to Urban Opportunities by Bus and Car (Case Study: Medical Land-use in the City of Isfahan)

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors
1 Student At Master Degree, Department of Transportation, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Transportation, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Accessibility, as a factor linking land use with the transportation system, measures the ease of access to urban opportunities and provides the possibility of comparing citizens' use of facilities and evaluating the equality between different people and groups in benefiting from different facilities. One of the urban opportunities is medical centers, which have significant effects on the citizen’s quality of life due to the provision of crucial services. Also, paying attention to sustainable transportation pursuing goals such as the development of public transportation infrastructure, reduction of environmental pollution, and other social costs is important among planners and decision-makers. The purpose of this study is to calculate and analyze the access to medical land uses in the city of Isfahan by bus and car and compare the distribution by these modes on a micro-scale (i.e., the statistical block). In this research, the gravity-based model based on geographical information system (GIS) is used and various transportation costs such as travel time value, vehicle depreciation, fuel consumption cost, and fare are included in the accessibility calculation. This study uses the Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve to evaluate and compare inequality in access to transportation facilities and medical opportunities through bus and car. The results showed that the central areas of Isfahan had a higher accessibility potential than other areas due to the high density of land use and transportation facilities (i.e., stations and various public transportation lines). In general, access by public transportation was lower than the private car, and the lack of public transportation facilities increased the accessibility gap between public transportation and private cars.

Keywords

Subjects


  • آزموده م. حقیقی ف (2017). "ارزیابی کاربری‌های زمین با توجه به دسترسی حمل ‌و نقلی (مطالعه موردی: منطقه 6 تهران)." فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری, 8.

 

  • شریفزادگان م ح، ممدوحی ا، لاوی م. (1389). نابرابری فضایی در دسترسی به خدمات درمان عمومی برای توسعه سلامت شهری از طریق مدل در شهر اصفهان p-median در شهر اصفهان. فصلنامه رفاه اجتماعی ; 10 (37) :285-265.

 

  • صباغی‌ابکوه ش. رهنما م. خاکپور ب (2019). "تحلیل قابلیت دسترسی سیستم قطار سبک شهری به خدمات بهداشتی- درمانی بیمارستان ها در کلانشهر مشهد." جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری 5(2): 1-21.

 

  • صالحی و، (1397) توسعه شاخص دسترسی، با توجه به مفهوم حمل‌ونقل پایدار(مطالعه موردی: بازار‌های کوثر شهر اصفهان). پایان‌نامه ارشد. استاد راهنما : حق‌شناس ح. اصفهان: دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، دانشکده حمل‌ونقل."
  • محمدی ع، هاشمی ر. معصوم آباد پ. محمدپور آ (1398). بررسی و تحلیل سطح دسترسی محلات شهر اردبیل به خدمات شهری (مراکز بهداشتی_ درمانی). کنفرانس ملی بهداشت و محیط زیست.

 

  • مشکینی ا، ابراهیمی م (1397). بررسی وضعیت دسترسی به مراکز خدمات رسانی درمانی با رویکرد عدالت فضایی (مطالعه موردی: منطقه ۷ تهران). راهبردهای مدیریت در نظام سلامت ۳ (۱) :۱۶-۵.

 

  • موکویی، خ. (1401) تحلیل و ارزیابی دسترسی به فرصت‌های شهری با رویکرد شهر اسلامی و با تأکید بر اصل عدالت از دیدگاه شهید صدر (مطالعه موردی اصفهان). پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد. اساتید راهنما: حق‌شناس ح، صاحبقرانی ع. اصفهان: دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، دانشکده حمل‌ونقل.

 

  • نظری س. (1394) ارائه روش طراحی بهینه برای شبکه حمل و نقل زمینی بین شهری با لحاظ نمودن عدالت اجتماعی. پایان‌نامه دکترا. استاد راهنما: بهبهانی ح. تهران: دانشگاه علم و صنعت."

 

  • Adli, S. N., S. Chowdhury and Y. Shiftan.(2019). "Justice in public transport systems: A comparative study of Auckland, Brisbane, Perth and Vancouver." Cities.90: 88-99.

 

  • Behbahani, H., S. Nazari, M. J. Kang and T. Litman.(2019). "A conceptual framework to formulate transportation network design problem considering social equity criteria." Transportation research part A: policy and practice.173.183.

 

  • Bocarejo S, J. P. and D. R. Oviedo H (2012). "Transport accessibility and social inequities: a tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments." Journal of transport geography 24: 142-. 154.

 

  • Caggiani, L., A. Colovic and M. Ottomanelli (2020). "An equality-based model for bike-sharing stations location in bicycle-public transport multimodal mobility." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 140: 251. 265.

 

  • Cervero, R., T. Rood and B. Appleyard (1999). "Tracking accessibility: employment and housing opportunities in the San Francisco Bay Area." Environment and Planning A 31(7): 1259.1278.

 

  • El-Geneidy, A. and D. Levinson (2011). "Place rank: valuing spatial interactions." Networks and Spatial Economics 11(4): 643.659.

 

  • Envall, P. (2007). Accessibility Planning: a chimera? , University of Leeds.

 

  • Gallo, M. (2020). "Assessing the equality of external benefits in public transport investments: The impact of urban railways on real estate values." Case Studies on Transport Policy 8(3): 758. 769.

 

  • Geurs, K. T. and J. R. van Eck (2003). "Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use scenarios: the implications of job competition, land-use, and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands." Environment and Planning B 30(1): 69.88.

 

  • Geurs, K. T. and B. Van Wee (2004). "Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions." Journal of Transport geography 12(2): -127-140.

 

  • Grengs, J. (2010). "Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in Detroit." Journal of Transport Geography 18(1): 42.54.

 

  • Grengs, J., J. Levine, and Q. Shen, (2013). Evaluating transportation equity: An intermetropolitan comparison of regional accessibility and urban form, United States. Federal Transit Administration. Office of Civil Rights.

 

  • Guzman, L. A., D. Oviedo and C. Rivera (2017). "Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region." Journal of Transport Geography 58: 236-.264.

 

  • Hamidi, Z., R. Camporeale and L. Caggiani (2019). "Inequalities in access to bike-and-ride opportunities: Findings for the city of Malmö." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 130: 673.688.

 

  • Handy, S. L., M. G. Boarnet, R. Ewing and R. E. Killingsworth (2002). "How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning." American Journal of Preventive Medicine 23(2): 64-73.

 

  • Handy, S. L. and D. A. Niemeier (1997). "Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives." Environment and planning A 29(7): 1175-1194.

 

  • Hansen, W. (1959). "How accessibility shapes land use Journal of the American Planning Association 25-2."

 

  • Jang, S., Y. An, C. Yi and S. Lee (2017). "Assessing the spatial equity of Seoul’s public transportation using the Gini coefficient based on its accessibility." International Journal of Urban Sciences 21(1): 91.107.

 

  • Kelobonye, K., H. Zhou, G. McCarney and J. C. Xia (2020). "Measuring the accessibility and spatial equity of urban services under competition using the cumulative opportunities measure." Journal of Transport Geography 85: .102706.

 

  • Koenig, J.-G. (1980). "Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application." Transportation 9(2): 145-172.

 

  • Levinson, D. and H. Wu (2020). "Towards a general theory of access." Journal of Transport and Land Use 13(1): 129.158.

 

  • Litman, T.,(2003) Reinventing transportation. Victoria Transportation Policy Institute.

 

  • Litman, T. and D. Burwell.(2006). Issues in sustainable transportation. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues. 6(4): p. 331-347.

 

  • Manual, H. C. (2010). "HCM." Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC 1207.

 

  • Mansourianfar, M.H. and Haghshenas, H. (2018). Micro-scale sustainability assessment of infrastructure projects on urban transportation systems: Case study of Azadi district, Isfahan, Iran. Journal of Cities. 72: p. 149-159.

 

  • Ramjerdi, F. (2006). "Equity measures and their performance in transportation." Transportation Research Record 1983(1): 67.74.

 

  • Sinha, K. C. and Labi, S. (2011). Transportation decision making: Principles of project evaluation and programming, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons.

 

  • Song, Y. and Kim, H. and Lee, K and Ahn, K. (2018). Subway network expansion and transit equity: A case study of Gwangju metropolitan area, South Korea. Transport Policy,. 72: p. 148-158.

 

  • Sanchez, T.W.,( 1999). The connection between public transit and employment: The cases of Portland and Atlanta. Journal of the American Planning Association,. 65(3): p. 284-296.

 

  • Tahmasbi, B. and H. Haghshenas (2019). "Public transport accessibility measure based on weighted door to door travel time." Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 76: 163. 177.

 

  • Tahmasbi, B., M. H. Mansourianfar, H. Haghshenas and I. Kim (2019). "Multimodal accessibility-based equity assessment of urban public facilities distribution." Sustainable Cities and Society 49: .101633.

 

  • Verma, A., M. Verma, T. Rahul, S. Khurana and A. Rai (2019). "Measuring accessibility of various facilities by walking in world’s largest mass religious gathering–Kumbh Mela." Sustainable cities and society 45: 79-86.

 

  • Wang, Y., A. Monzon and F. Di Ciommo (2015). "Assessing the accessibility impact of transport policy by a land-use and transport interaction model–The case of Madrid." Computers, environment and urban systems 49: 126-135.

 

  • Zuo, T., H. Wei, N. Chen and C. Zhang (2020). "First-and-last mile solution via bicycling to improving transit accessibility and advancing transportation equity." Cities 99: 102612.
Volume 15, Issue 3 - Serial Number 60
Winter 2024
Pages 3845-3863

  • Receive Date 05 November 2022
  • Revise Date 13 March 2023
  • Accept Date 14 March 2023