بررسی اثر عادت به رانندگی بر تغییر وسیله در پاسخ به سیاستهای مدیریتی حمل و نقل

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، مؤسسه عالی آموزش و پژوهش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

یکی از دلایل عدم توفیق در ایجاد تمایل به تغییر وسیله در رانندگان، تبدیل شدن رانندگی به عادتی برای آنهاست. اهمیت این مسأله وقتی روشن می‌شود که اعمال سیاست‌های مدیریت تقاضای حمل ونقل با هدف کاهش استفاده از خودروی شخصی مد نظر باشد. این مطالعه با در نظر گرفتن دو گروه از رانندگان؛ دسته‌ای که هر روز برای رسیدن به محل کار خود رانندگی می‌کنند و دسته‌ای که بعضی از روزهای هفته با وسیله نقلیه شخصی به محل کار خود می‌روند و بقیه روزهای هفته از سایر وسایل استفاده می‌کنند؛ و با استفاده از مدل لوجیت دوگانه، نشان می‌دهد که در شرایط مواجهه با سیاست‌های مدیریت تقاضا واکنش افرادی که عادت به استفاده هرروزه از سواری شخصی دارند در مقایسه با کسانی که گاهی از وسایلی غیر از سواری شخصی استفاده می‌کنند متفاوت است. همچنین این مطالعه بر اساس نتایج به دست آمده پیشنهاد می-کند که برای ایجاد تغییر در وسیله سفر انتخابی این دو گروه، از سیاست‌های مختلف مدیریت تقاضا، متناسب با تفاوت‌های آنها، استفاده شود. بر اساس نتایج این مطالعه کسانی که عادت به رانندگی دارند از سیاست‌های بهبود حمل و نقل همگانی تأثیر نمی‌پذیرند و تنها سیاست‌های بازدارنده استفاده از خودروی شخصی در تغییر وسیله آنها عاملی معنادار شناخته می‌شود. در حالی که در مورد کسانی که عادت به استفاده هرروزه از خودروی شخصی ندارند هر دو گروه سیاستی معنادار هستند. پژوهش حاضر بر اساس نتایج ادبیات تحقیق که به اهمیت اثر شکسته شدن عادت رانندگی بر انتخاب سایر وسایل اشاره کرده است، پیشنهاد می کند که با حذف سیاست اعطای سالانه مجوز طرح ترافیک امکان شکست عادت افرادی که هر روزه رانندگی می کنند فراهم شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of Driving Habit on Change Mode in Response to Transportation Demand Management Policies

نویسنده [English]

  • ReyhanehSadat Shahangian
Assistant Professor, Institute for Management and Policy Studies (IMPS), Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

OOne of the reasons of drivers' disinterest towards changing travel mode is that driving is a habit for them. The importance of the fact reveals more when transportation demand management (TDM) policies are implemented to reduce car-use. As in most efforts the aimed reduction in car-share won't achieved, researchers believe that the better we understand the factors affecting the mode choice behavior, the better we could estimate travel demand management policies' outcome. This paper pays attention to two groups of commuter drivers to the central business district (CBD) of Tehran, one with strong driving habit (who drive to work/school daily) and the other who just drive some of the week days to work/school. Using binary logit models, it shows that mode choice behavior of people with driving habit is different from others with no strong habit, when both groups face a TDM policy package. It also uses the results to suggest some relevant policies to increase mode shift from car for each of the two groups separately. Models show that commuters with driving habit do not change their mode in response to transit service improvement strategies, while others with no strong driving habit do so. According to the literature a defect in driving habit may cause commuters to think of other modes, so the present research suggests to eliminate the yearly pass to CBD to make such a crack in driving habit of the owners of the pass and make them to think over using other modes rather than driving daily.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Transportation demand management
  • mode choice
  • driving habit
  • binary logit model
-Ben-Akiva, Moshe Emanual (1973) "Structure of passenger travel demand models", PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
-Choo, S. and Mokhtarian, P. L. (2008) "How do people respond to congestion mitigation policies? A multivariate probit model of the individual consideration of three travel-related strategy bundles", Transportation, Vol. 35, pp. 145-163.
-Dong, H., Ma, L. and Broach, J. (2016) "Promoting sustainable travel modes for commute tours: A comparison of the effects of home and work locations and employer-provided incentives", International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 10, Issue 6, pp. 485-494.
-Friedrichsmeier, T., Matthies, E. and Klockner, C. A. (2013) "Explaining stability in travel mode choice: An empirical comparison of two concepts of habit", Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 16, pp. 1-13.
-Fuji, S. and Kitamura, R. (2003) "What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change", Transportation, Vol. 30, pp. 81-95.
-Garling, T., and Schuitema, G. (2007) "Travel demand management targeting reduced private car use: Effectiveness, public acceptability and political feasibility", Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 63, pp. 139-153.
-Habibian, M. and Kermanshah, M. (2012) "Investigating the contribution of transportation demand management policies to car commuters mode change", Quarterly Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 181-197 (in Persian).
-Habibian, M. and Kermanshah, M. (2015) "Contribution of travel-related variables to car commuters’ mode change”, Quarterly Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 7, No.1, pp. 13-30 (in Persian).
-Hoffmann, C., Abraham, C., White M. P., Ball, S. and  Skippon, S. M. (2017) "What cognitive mechanisms predict travel mode choice? A systematic review with meta-analysis", Transport Reviews, DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1285819
-Hosmer, D. W. and Lemeshow, S. (2000) Introduction to the Logistic Regression Model, in Applied Logistic Regression, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA.
-Litman, T. (1999) "Potential transportation demand management strategies", Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Canada.
-Litman, T. (2014) "TDM Encyclopedia", Source: Victoria Transport Policy Institute, website: www.vtpi.org
-Liu, Y., Hong, Z. and Liu, Y. (2016) "Do driving restriction policies effectively motivate commuters to use public transportation?", Energy Policy, Vol. 90, pp. 253-261.
-Loukopoulos, P., Jakobsson, C. and Gärling, T. (2004) "Car-user responses to travel demand management measures: Goal setting and choice of adaptation alternatives", Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 263-280.
-Marsden, G. and Docherty, I. (2013) "Insights on disruption as opportunities for transport policy change", Transportation Research Part A,  Vol. 51, pp. 46-55.
-O' Fallon, C., Sullivan, C. and Hensher, D. A. (2004) "Constraints affecting mode choices by morning car commuters", Transport Policy, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 17-29.
-Shahangian, R., Kermanshah, M. and Mokhtarian,  P. L. (2012) "Gender differences in response policies targeting commute to automobile-restricted central business district: --Stated preference study of mode choice Tehran, Iran", Transportation Research Record, No. 2320, pp. 80-89.
-Shahangian, R. (2013) "Effects of transportation policies on change mode behavior of women and men: case study of Tehran", PhD Dissertation, advisor: Mohammad Kermanshah, Tehran: Civil Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology (in Persian).
-Simicevic, J., Milosavljevic, N. and Djoric, V. (2016) "Gender differences in travel behavior and willingness to adopt sustainable behavior", Transportation Planning and Technology, DOI:10.1080/03081060.2016.1174367.
-Stead, D. (2006) "The effectiveness of policies to address urban environmental problems: Some perceptions and realities", World Transport Policy Practice, Vol. 12, pp. 35–49.
-Thogersen, J. (2012) "The Importance of timing for breaking commuters' car driving habits", A. Warde & D. Southerton (Eds), The Habits of Consumption, Vol. 12, pp 130-140. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies.
-Thogersen, J. and Moller, B. (2008) "Breaking car-use habits: The effectiveness of a free month travel” Transportation, Vol. 44, pp. 1083-1104.
Thomas, G. O., Poortinga, W. and Sautkina, E. (2016) "Habit discontinuity, self-activation, and the diminishing influence of context change: Evidence from the UK understanding society survey", PLoS ONE, Vol. 11, No. 4.
-Walker, I., Thomas, G. O. and Verplanken, B. (2015) "Old habit die hard: Travel habit formation and decay during an office relocation", Environment and Behavior, Vol. 47, No. 10, pp. 1089-1106.