Traffic Cordon Pricing Model Considering Link Capacity Constraint

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 MSc. Grad., Institute of Higher Education for Management and Planning, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Links have capacity which is their physical attribute, as soon as flow in link reaches capacity, in flow pattern of network, at upstream links queue appears and network becomes congested. Cordon Congestion pricing is one of the effective ways that can reduce overcrowding in the congested central districts of networks without any negative impact on whole of the network. The purpose of this study is to present a congestion pricing model considering link capacity constraint. To this purpose, a bi-level model is proposed, where in the upper level the optimal toll is determined, and in the lower level the equilibrium is guaranteed using a traffic assignment model. An algorithm based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) is presented as a solving method for upper level problem and Shahpar’s method is used to solve assignment problem is lower level. The proposed algorithm is applied on Sioux-falls network with and without the capacity constraint. Results show that optimal pricing is affected by road capacity information. In Sioux-falls network from 10 links entering cordon, 6 links get toll, while in the solution, regardless of capacity constraint, 8 links get toll. The total cost of the network in terms of pricing, considering links capacity, improves by 13.1% relative to the lack of pricing. This improvement is 0.38% for a situation where capacity is not seen. The total toll on the cordon is also reduced from 1.86 to 0.86 units.

Keywords

Main Subjects


-       Aashtiani, H. A and Magnanti, T. (1983) “A linearization and decomposition algorithm for computing urban traffic equilibria”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Operations Research Center
-       Aashtiani, H. Z. (1979) ”The multi-modal traffic assignment problem”, PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
-       Alonze, S. (2015) “Traffic congestion to cost the UK economy more than £300 billion over the next 16 years”, [online] Available at: http://inrix.com/press-releases/traffic-congestion-to-cost-the-uk-economy-more-than-300-billion-over-the-next-16-years/ [accessed 14 October. 2014].
-       Asadi, S., Florian,M. and Sarvi, M. )2016( “A new policy in congestion pricing: Why only toll? Why not subsidy? Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur les Réseaux d'Entreprise, la Logistique et le Transport (CIRRELT), Montreal, Canada.
-       Branston, D. (1976) “Link capacity functin: A review”, Transportation Research, Vol. 10, pp. 223-236.
-       Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics (BITRE)( 2015) “Traffic and congestion cost trends for Australian capital cities”, Information Sheet 74, BITRE, Canberra
By Penalty Methods”, Proc. IEEE Internat.Conf. Circuits Comput, Vol. 1, pp.162–166
-       Cavallaro, F., Giaretta, F and Nocera,S. (2017). "The potential of road pricing schemes to reduce carbon emissions." Transport Policy, Vol. 67, pp. 85-92
-       Dafermos, S. (1973) “Toll patterns for multiclass-user transportation networks”. Transportation Science”, Vol.7, No.3, pp. 211-223
-       Daganzo, C. (1977) “On the traffic assignment problem with flow dependent costs—I”, Transportation Research, Vol.11, No.6, pp.433-437.
-         De Palma, A., Lindsey, R. (2004) “Congestion pricing with heterogeneous travelers: A general-equilibrium welfare analysis”, Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol.4, No.2, 135-160.
-       Gu, Z., Liu, Z., Cheng, Q and Saberi, M. (2018).” Congestion pricing practices and public acceptance: A review of evidence.” Case Studies on Transport Policy . Vol.6, No.1, 94-101.
-     Hearn, D., Ribera, J. (1980) “Bounded Flow Equilibrium Problems by penalty methods. New York, IEEE, Vol.1, pp. 162–166.
-       Hestenes, M. (1969) “Multipliers and gradient methods”, Journal of Optimization Theories and Applications”, Vol.4, No.5, pp.303–320.
-       Inouye, H. (1987) “Traffic equilibria and its solution in congested road networks”, Proceedings of IFAC Conference on Control in Transportation Systems, Vienna, July 1986. Pp.267-272
-       Knight, F. (1924) “Some fallacies in the interpretation of social cost”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.38, No.4, pp. 582-606.
-       Kolstad, C. D. (1985) “A review of the literature on bi-level mathematical programming”, No. LA-10284-MS). Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
-       Larsson, T. and Patriksson, M. (1994) “Equilibrium characterizations of solutions to side constrained asymmetric traffic assignment models”, Le Matematiche, Vol.49, No.2, pp. 249-280
-       Larsson, T. and Patriksson, M. (1995) “An augmented Lagrangean dual algorithm for link capacity side constrained traffic assignment problems”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol.29, No.6, pp.433–455.
-       Leblanc, L., Morlok, E. and Pierskalla, W. (1975) “An efficient approach to solving the road network equilibrium traffic assignment problem”, Transportation Research., Vol.9, No.5, pp.309-318.
-       Nie, Y.,.Zhang, H. M and Lee, D. H. (2004) “Models and algorithms for the traffic assignment problem with link capacity constraints”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol.38, No.4, pp.285-312.
-       Pigou, A. (1920) “The economics of welfare”, London: Palgrave Macmillan,”.
-       Powell, M. J. D. (1969) “A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems”, Optimization”, pp. 283-293.
-       Shahpar, A., Aashtiani. H. A. and Babazadeh, A. (2008) "Dynamic penalty function method for the side constrained traffic assignment problem." Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol.206, No.1, pp.332-345.
-       Sheffi, Y. (1985) "Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods", New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
-             Small, K., Yan, J. (2001) “The value of “value pricing” of roads: Second-best pricing and product differentiation”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol.49, No.2, pp. 310-336.
-             Verhoef, E., Rouwendal, J and Rietveld, P, (2003) “Congestion Caused by speed differences”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp.383-406.
-             Walters, A. (1961) "The theory and measurement of private and social cost of highway congestion",Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,Vol.29,No.4, pp 676-699
-             Wardrop, J. G. (1952) “Some theorithical aspect of road traffic research”, London: Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Part II, Engineering Divisions, Airport Maritime Railway Road.
-             Yin, Y. and Lawphongpanich, S. (2009) “Alternative marginal-cost pricing for road networks”, NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, Vol.10, No.1, pp.77-83.
-       آرین کاظمی، بابک میربها و علی عبدی کردانی.(1397) بررسی تاثیر هزینه پارکینگ حاشیه‏ای بر انتخاب یا عدم انتخاب شیوه سواری شخصی، فصلنامه مهندسی حمل‏ونقل،سال نهم، شماره سوم355-343
-       جوانی، ب. )1397(. تخصیص ترافیک پویای چند کلاسی: فرمولبندی و الگوریتم مبتنی بر مسیر، پایان‌نامه دکتری، دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه تهران
- فلاح تفتی، م.، شهابی،س و تفی زاده، ی. (1397). مدل‏سازی رفتار انتخاب وسیله کاربران وسایل نقلیه شخصی در قبال اعمال سیاست‏های مدیریت تقاضای سفر، ، فصلنامه مهندسی حمل‏ونقل،سال نهم، شماره چهارم، 595-571