تاثیر شرایط سبقت اتوبوس‌ها در استراتژی کنترلی تمام توقف بر زمان انتظار مسافران

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان
مسعود محمد حسین میرزایی 1
عبدالرضا شیخ الاسلامی 2
میرسامان پیشوایی 3
1 کارشناس ارشد، گروه مهندسی حمل‌ونقل، دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه مهندسی حمل‌ونقل، دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، ایران
3 دانشیار، گروه مهندسی سیستم‌های هوشمند، دانشکده مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، ایران
10.22119/jte.2022.347335.2606
چکیده
سیستم‌های حمل‌ونقلی سیستم‌های ناپایداری هستند و این ناپایداری بر روی شاخص‌های قابلیت اطمینان سیستم‌های حمل‌ونقل تاثیر گذار است. برای افزایش قابلیت اطمینان می‌توان از استراتژی‌های کنترلی استفاده کرد. یکی از استراتژی‌های کنترلی، توقف اتوبوس‌ها در ایستگاه‌ها است. پژوهش‌های بسیاری بر روی استراتژی کنترلی اولین توقف و تاثیر آن بر روی زمان انتظار مسافران در گذشته صورت گرفته است. اما در این پژوهش از استراتژی کنترلی توقف در تمام ایستگاه‌های افق زمانی (تمام توقف) تحت تاثیر  شرایط سبقت اتوبوس‌ها، که در پژوهش‌های قبلی مورد بررسی قرار نگرفته بود، استفاده می‌شود. سناریوی عدم وجود شرایط سبقت اتوبوس‌ها و سناریوی وجود شرایط سبقت اتوبوس­ها معرفی‌شده و برای هرکدام یک مدل ریاضی جداگانه ارائه‌ شده است. مدل ریاضی برای هرکدام از سناریوها شامل تابع هدف از نوع کمینه‌سازی و محدودیت‌های مربوط به هرکدام است. در مدل ریاضی ارائه‌شده، تاثیر استراتژی کنترلی تمام توقف تحت تاثیر شرایط سبقت، بر زمان انتظار مسافران داخل اتوبوس و داخل ایستگاه مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. در ادامه یک مثال فرضی برای حل مدل و یک مطالعه‌ی موردی بر روی خط 5 BRT تهران انجام شده است و بر روی برخی پارامترهای مدل مانند حداکثر ظرفیت اتوبوس و طول افق زمانی تحلیل حساسیت انجام گرفته است. نتایج تحلیل حساسیت نشان داد که با افزایش ظرفیت اتوبوس و کاهش طول افق زمانی زمان انتظار مسافران کاهش می‌یابد. همچنین برای هرکدام از سناریوها زمان توقف اتوبوس‌ها در هر ایستگاه، به‌منظور کمینه‌سازی زمان انتظار مسافران در داخل اتوبوس و داخل ایستگاه مشخص شد. نتایج مطالعه‌ی موردی و مثال فرضی نشان می‌دهند که زمان انتظار مسافران در حالتی که از استراتژی کنترلی استفاده شده است نسبت به حالت بدون استراتژی کنترلی حدود 3 درصد کاهش‌یافته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

The Effect of Bus Overtaking Conditions in all holding Control Strategy on Passengers Waiting Time

نویسندگان English

Masoud mohammad hosein mirzaei 1
Abdolreza Sheikholeslami 2
mir saman pishvaee 3
1 M.Sc., Grad., School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Asistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Industrial engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Transportation systems tend to be unstable and this instability affects the reliability indices of transportation systems. To improve reliability, control strategies can be used. One of the control strategies is holding the buses at the stops. In this study, the holding control strategy in all rolling horizon stops is used. Many researches have been done on the control strategy of the first holding strategy and its effect on the waiting time of passengers in the past. However, in this research, the holding control strategy at all stations of the rolling horizon (all holding) is used under the influence of overtaking conditions of buses, which was not investigated in previous researches. The scenario of the absence of overtaking conditions of buses and the scenario of the presence of overtaking conditions of buses are introduced and a separate mathematical model is presented for each. The mathematical model for each of the scenarios includes the objective function of the minimization type and the constraints related to each. In the presented mathematical model, the impact of the all holding control strategy under the influence of overtaking conditions on the waiting time of passengers inside the bus and inside the station has been investigated. In the following, a hypothetical example to solve the model and a case study on Tehran's BRT line 5 have been carried out,and sensitivity analysis has been carried out on some parameters of the model, such as the maximum bus capacity and the length of the rolling horizon. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that by increasing the bus capacity and decreasing the length of the rolling horizon, the waiting time of passengers decreases. Also, for each of the scenarios, the holding time of the buses at each station was determined in order to minimize the waiting time of the passengers inside the bus and inside the station. The results of the case study and the hypothetical example show that the waiting time of passengers in the case where the control strategy is used is reduced by about 3% compared to the case without the control strategy.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

control strategy
passengers’ waiting time
buses’ holding time
  • نایبی، ذگردی، امین ناصری، یقینی، (1395). "بهینه‌سازی استراتژی‌های مدیریت اختلال در خطوط راه‌آهن شهری با استفاده از الگوریتم جستجوی همسایگی متغیر"، مهندسی حمل‌ونقل، سال نهم، شماره سوم، بهار 1397.

 

 

  • Asgharzadeh, Mohamad Amin. 2017. Real-Time Bus Holding Control Strategy to Reduce Passenger Waiting Time.

 

 

  • Chen, Weiya, Hengpeng Zhang, Chunxiao Chen, and X Wei. 2021. “An Integrated Bus Holding and Speed Adjusting Strategy Considering Passenger’s Waiting Time Perceptions.” Sustainability 13: 5529.

 

  • Delgado, Felipe, Juan Carlos Muñoz, Ricardo Giesen, and Aldo Cipriano. 2009. “Real-Time Control of Buses in a Transit Corridor Based on Vehicle Holding and Boarding Limits.” Transportation Research Record 2090(1): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.3141/2090-07.

 

  • Eberlein, Xu Jun, Nigel H M Wilson, and David Bernstein. 2001. “The Holding Problem with Real–Time Information Available.” Transportation Science 35(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.35.1.1.10143.

 

  • Eberlein, Xujun, Nigel H M Wilson, Cynthia Barnhart, and David Bernstein. 1998. “THE REAL-TIME DEADHEADING PROBLEM IN TRANSIT OPERATIONS CONTROL.” Transportation Research Part B-methodological 32: 77–100.

 

  • Eberlein, Xujun, Nigel H M Wilson, and David Bernstein. 1999. “Modeling Real-Time Control Strategies in Public Transit Operations.” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems: 325–46.

 

  • Asgharzadeh, Mohamad Amin. 2017. Real-Time Bus Holding Control Strategy to Reduce Passenger Waiting Time.

 

  • Cats, Oded et al. 2012. “Bus Holding Control Strategies: A Simulation-Based Evaluation and Guidelines for Implementation.” Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2274: 100–108.

 

  • Chen, Weiya, Hengpeng Zhang, Chunxiao Chen, and X Wei. 2021. “An Integrated Bus Holding and Speed Adjusting Strategy Considering Passenger’s Waiting Time Perceptions.” Sustainability 13: 5529.

 

  • Delgado, Felipe, Juan Carlos Muñoz, Ricardo Giesen, and Aldo Cipriano. 2009. “Real-Time Control of Buses in a Transit Corridor Based on Vehicle Holding and Boarding Limits.” Transportation Research Record 2090(1): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.3141/2090-07.

 

  • Eberlein, Xu Jun, Nigel H M Wilson, and David Bernstein. 2001. “The Holding Problem with Real–Time Information Available.” Transportation Science 35(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.35.1.1.10143.

 

  • Eberlein, Xujun, Nigel H M Wilson, Cynthia Barnhart, and David Bernstein. 1998. “THE REAL-TIME DEADHEADING PROBLEM IN TRANSIT OPERATIONS CONTROL.” Transportation Research Part B-methodological 32: 77–100.

 

  • Eberlein, Xujun, Nigel H M Wilson, and David Bernstein. 1999. “Modeling Real-Time Control Strategies in Public Transit Operations.” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems: 325–46.

 

  • Fu, Liping, and Xuhui Yang. 2002. “Design and Implementation of Bus–Holding Control Strategies with Real-Time Information.” Transportation Research Record 1791(1): 6–12. https://doi.org/10.3141/1791-02.

 

  • Gkiotsalitis, Konstantinos. 2019. Bus Holding Control of Running Buses in Time Windows.

 

  • Hickman, Mark D. 2001. “An Analytic Stochastic Model for the Transit Vehicle Holding Problem.” Transportation Science 35(3): 215–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.35.3.215.10150.

 

  • Ibarra-Rojas, O J, F Delgado, R Giesen, and J C Muñoz. 2015. “Planning, Operation, and Control of Bus Transport Systems: A Literature Review.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 77: 38–75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261515000454.

 

  • Laskaris, G, O Cats, E Jenelius, and F Viti. 2016. “A Real-Time Holding Decision Rule Accounting for Passenger Travel Cost.” In 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), , 2410–15.

 

  • Laskaris, Georgios et al. 2021. “A Holding Control Strategy for Diverging Bus Lines.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 126: 103087. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X2100108X.

 

  • Liang, Shidong, Shengxue He, Hu Zhang, and Minghui Ma. 2021. “Optimal Holding Time Calculation Algorithm to Improve the Reliability of High Frequency Bus Route Considering the Bus Capacity Constraint.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 212: 107632.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021001733.

 

  • Liang, Shidong, Minghui Ma, and Shengxue He. 2019. “Multiobjective Optimal Formulations for Bus Fleet Size of Public Transit under Headway-Based Holding Control” ed. Dongjoo Park. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2019: 2452348. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2452348.

 

  • Moreira-Matias, Luís et al. 2016. “An Online Learning Approach to Eliminate Bus Bunching in Real-Time.” Applied Soft Computing 47: 460–82. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494616303118.

 

  • Nesheli, Mahmood Mahmoodi, and Avishai (Avi) Ceder. 2017. “Real-Time Public Transport Operations: Library of Control Strategies.” Transportation Research Record 2647(1): 26–32. https://doi.org/10.3141/2647-04.

 

  • Newell, Gordon Frank, and Renfrey Burnard Potts. 1964. “Maintaining a Bus Schedule.” In Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Conference, 2nd, 1964, Melbourne.

 

  • O_Dell, Susan W, and Nigel H M Wilson. 1999. “Optimal Real-Time Control Strategies for Rail Transit Operations during Disruptions.” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems: 299–323.

 

  • Osuna, E E, and G F Newell. 1972. “Control Strategies for an Idealized Public Transportation System.” Transportation Science 6(1): 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.6.1.52.

 

  • Sánchez-Martínez, G E, Haris Koutsopoulos, and N H M Wilson. 2016. “Real-Time Holding Control for High-Frequency Transit with Dynamics.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 83: 1–19.

 

  • Turnquist, Mark A. 1981. “STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF BUS TRANSIT SERVICE.” Transportation Research Record.

 

  • Turnquist, Mark A, and Steven W Blume. 1980. “EVALUATING POTENTIAL EFFECTIVENESS OF HEADWAY CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR TRANSIT SYSTEMS.” Transportation Research Record.

 

  • Wang, Jiawei, and Lijun Sun. 2020. “Dynamic Holding Control to Avoid Bus Bunching: A Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 116: 102661. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X20305763.

 

  • Xuan, Yiguang, Juan Argote, and Carlos F Daganzo. 2011. “Dynamic Bus Holding Strategies for Schedule Reliability: Optimal Linear Control and Performance Analysis.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45(10): 1831–45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261511001093.

 

  • Zolfaghari, Saeed, Nader Azizi, and Mohamad Y Jaber. 2004. “A Model for Holding Strategy in Public Transit Systems with Real-Time Information.” International Journal of Transport Management 2(2): 99–110. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471405105000030.

 

  • تاریخ دریافت 26 خرداد 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 22 مرداد 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 31 مرداد 1401