Economic Evaluation of Public Transit Systems Considering Uncertainties in Economic Parameters: The Case of City of Qom Metro System

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Abstract

In order to find the most economical scenario/alternative among the different proposed set of scenarios/alternatives, one approach is to perform an engineering economy evaluation, or stated more precisely, a cost benefit analysis (CBA). Within the conventional CBA context, all the monetizable costs and benefits of each decision alternative are determined and the CBA procedure is put forward by these deterministic and exact values. However, when the costs and benefits embody considerable uncertainties, one needs to leverage an adapted tool to be capable to perform the CBA with such uncertainties. In this regard, Fuzzy set theory could be a promising approach to handle the inherent uncertainties in the economic evaluation of the projects. In this paper, the classical equations of the CBA are extended to the fuzzy environment and according to the economic situation of Iran, the interest rate, inflation rate, exchange rate, and the construction period is considered as the fuzzy variables. Subsequently, the proposed fuzzy-CBA approach is employed for the economic evaluation of the Qom metro system. The fuzzy variables used in this paper are selected according to the specific economic situation of the country that was affected by international sanctions, high inflation rates, and mismanagement of the economy.

Keywords

References

- Abbastabar, Sajjad (2013) “Fuzzy benefit/Cost  analysis of rail transit projects considering uncertainties in the Construction Schedule of the project: The case study of Qom Metro System”, Theses of Master of Science, College of Engineering, University of Tehran. Tehran, Iran  (in Persian).
-Abtahi, S.M.( 2012) “Economic and financial studies of Shahinshahr rail system alternatives”, Isfahan Metro Company, Isfahan Municipality, Isfahan, Iran (in Persian).
-Bristow, A. and Nellthorp, J. (2000) “Transport project appraisal in the European Union”, Transport policy,7(1), pp. 51-60.
-Choobineh, F. and Behrens, A. (1992) “Use of intervals and possibility distributions in economic analysis”, Journal of the operational research society, 43(9), pp. 907-918.
-Dimitrovski, A. and Matos, M. (2008) “Fuzzy present worth analysis with correlated and uncorrelated cash flows”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Kahraman, C. (ed.), Springer, pp. 11-41.
-Dimitrovski, A. and Matos, M. (2000) “Fuzzy engineering economic analysis [of electric utilities]”, Power Systems, IEEE Transactions , 15(1), pp. 283-289.
-Gozarrah Consulting Engineers (2006) “Feasibility study of Qom urban rail system”, Qom Municipality, Qom, Iran (in Persian).
-Kahraman, C. (2001) “Fuzzy versus probabilistic benefit/cost ratio analysis for public works projects”, Mathematics And Computer Science, 11(3), pp. 705-718.
-Kahraman, C. (2008) “Fuzzy sets in engineering economic decision-making”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Springer, pp. 1-9.
-Kahraman, C. (2008) “Investment analyses using fuzzy decision trees”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Springer, pp. 231-242.
-Kahraman, C. and Demircan, M. (2008) “Fuzzy replacement analysis”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Kahraman, C. (ed.), Springer, pp. 145-157.
-Kahraman, C., Demirel, T. and Demirel, N. (2008) “Effects of inflation under fuzziness and Some applications”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Kahraman, C. (ed.), Springer, pp. 173-182.
-Kahraman, C. and Kaya, I. (2008) “Fuzzy equivalent annual-worth analysis and applications”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Kahraman, C. (ed.) Springer, pp. 71-81.
-Kahraman, C. and Kaya, I. (2008) “Depreciation and income tax considerations under fuzziness”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Kahraman, C. (ed.), Springer, pp. 159-171.
-Kahraman, C. and Kaya, I. (2008) “Fuzzy benefit/cost analysis and applications”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Kahraman, C. (ed.), Springer, pp. 129-143.
-Kahraman, C., Tolga, E. and Ulukan, Z. (1998) “Justification of manufacturing technologies using fuzzy benefit/cost ratio analysis”, International Journal of Production Economics, 66(1), pp. 45-52.
-Khademi, N., Rajabi, M., Shariat, A. and Shahi, J. (2013) “Deriving fuzzy inequalities using discrete approximation of fuzzy numbers”, International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 24(3), pp. 207-216.
-Khisty, C. and Lall, B. (1998) “Transportation engineering”, Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River.
-Kuchta, D. (2008) “Fuzzy rate of return analysis and applications”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Kahraman, C. (ed.), Springer, pp. 97-104.
-Kuchta, D. (2008) “Optimization with fuzzy present worth analysis and applications”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Kahraman, C. (ed.), Springer, pp. 43-69.
-Liou, T. and Chen, C. (2006) “Fuzzy decision analysis for alternative selection using a fuzzy annual worth criterion”, The Engineering Economist, 51(1), pp. 19-34.
-Matos, M. and Dimitrovski, A. (2008) “Case studies using fuzzy equivalent annual worth analysis”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Kahraman, C. (ed.), Springer, pp. 83-95.
-Omitaomu, O. and Badiru, A. (2007) “Fuzzy present value analysis model for evaluating information system projects”, The Engineering Economist, 52(2), pp. 157-178.
-Oskunejad, M.M. (2005) “Engineering economics”, Amirkabir University Press, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
-Sewastjanow, P. and Dymowa, L. (2008) “On the fuzzy internal rate of return”, in Fuzzy Engineering Economics with Applications, Kahraman, C. (ed.), Springer, pp. 105-128.
-SPASM (1998) “Sketch planning analysis spreadsheet model”, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
-STEAM2 (2001) “Surface transportation efficiency analysis model”, Cambridge Systematics.
-Tarh-e-Haftom Consulting Engineers (2009) “Comrehensive transportation study of Urmia”, Urmia  Municipality , Urmia , Iran (in Persian).
-TCRP Report 78 (2002) “Estimating the benefits and costs of public transit projects: A guidebook for practitioners”, Transit Cooperative Research Program, National Academy Press,  Washington DC.
-Van Wee, B. (2012) “How suitable is CBA for the ex-ante evaluation of transport projects and policies? A discussion from the perspective of ethics”, 19(1), Transport Policy, pp. 1-7.
-Wang, M. and Liang, G. (1995) “Benefit/cost analysis using fuzzy concept”, Engineering Economist, 40(4), pp. 359-376.
Quarterly Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
January 2015
Pages 117-144

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 November 2013
  • Accept Date: 25 May 2014

Share

How to cite

Statistics