Developing A Method for Equity Measurement in Transit Systems

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Author

Abstract

This paper describes the development of methods of calculating the amount of equity in the ‎distribution of public services in the cities. For this purpose, a combination of access and ‎mobility, the Connectivity Power as the primary benefit of the public transportation system ‎introduced for citizen. Vertical equity approach was selected as the approach. The number of ‎people without personal car was considered as an indicator of the need for public ‎transportation services were considered. The state of public transport facilities are distributed ‎according to the needs of residents of each area in the three-year base period (there are regular ‎bus lines corresponding to the condition of 5 years), the current year (the current situation of ‎the city bus system, a BRT line and stations active in a part of the Metro Line 1) and the ‎future (5 years, completed BRT projects and full exploitation of subway line 1) deals. The ‎urban areas in terms of providing power connection as well as the needs were arranged and ‎the two lists for each period were compared. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to ‎measure the status of each area and the Gini coefficient to measure the overall situation of the ‎city were used. The results show that although the situation is better than the base year, the ‎situation is fairly significant distance. Extremist complete bus lines and subway line 1 a ‎significant improvement in terms of the balance of supply and demand situation will not ‎improve but the Gini coefficient. The priority areas were identified for development services.‎

Keywords


-Foth, N.,  El-Geneidy, A. M. and Manaugh, K. (2013) “Towards equitable transit: examining transit accessibility and         social need “, Journal of Transport Geography No. 29, pp. 1–10.
- Hensher, David A. and Li, Z.  (2011) “Ridership drivers of bus rapid transit systems”, J. Transportation, Vol. 39, No. 6, 1209-1221.
-Kahn, M. E., Glaeser, E. L. and Rappaport, J. (2008) “Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation”, Journal of Urban Economics Vol. 63. No. 1,  pp. 1–24.
-Litman, T. (2002) "Evaluating transportation equity", World Transport Policy & Practice, Vol. 8, No.2, pp. 50-65.
-Manaugh, K. and El-Geneidy, A. (2012) “Who benefits from new transportation infrastructure? Using accessibility measures to evaluate social equity in transit provision”, Accessibility and Transport Planning: Challenges for Europe and North America, pp. 1035-1053.
-Martens K., Golub A. and Robinson, G. (2012) “A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the United States” , Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 46. No. 4,  pp. 684–695
-Mishraam, S., Welch, T. F. and KJha, M. (2012) ”Performance indicators for public transit connectivity in multi-modal transportation networks”, Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 46, No. 7, pp.1066–1085.
-Murray, A. and Davis, R. (2001)”Equity in regional service provision”,  Journal of Regional Science Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 557–60. DOI10.1111/0022-4146.00233 
-Ong, P. M. and Miller, D. (2005) “Spatial and transportation mismatch in Los Angeles”, Journal of Planning Education and Research Vol. 25, No. 1, pp.43-56.
-Ricciardi, Anthony Michael, Jianhong Cecilia Xia and Currie, Graham (2015) "Exploring public transport equity between separate disadvantaged cohorts: a case study in Perth, Australia", Journal of Transport Geography,  Vol. 43, pp.111-122.
-S.Siegel, S.(1956), “Nonparametric Satatistics: for the behavioral sciences”, McGraw-Hill.
-Welch T. F. (2013) “Equity in transport: The distribution of transit access and connectivity among affordable housing units”, Transport Policy Vol. 30, pp. 283–293.