Shared bicycle systems are proposed to respond to urban mobility challenges as a healthy, efficient and relatively cheap means of transportation. Although these systems are widely implemented around the world, there are still challenges for implementation. The implementation of shared bicycle projects represents an important innovation in urban public transportation. These plans have spread rapidly and now exist all over the world in cities with different economic, environmental and structural conditions. Developing strategies through which to attract new members to join the plan and retain existing members is a fundamental requirement for the success of the plan. The purpose of this research is to identify the effective criteria on citizens' acceptance and use of shared bicycles with the method of synthesis research. The unit of analysis in this research is all English-language articles published in reputable foreign journals with quantitative analyzes on the identification of these factors. By searching in various scientific databases and carefully examining the articles, finally 30 articles related to the topic were found. The seven-step model of Sandelowski and Baros was used to analyze the obtained articles. The results show that the most important criteria affecting the acceptance of shared bicycles by citizens are perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude, facilitating conditions, cost, service quality, infrastructure, user satisfaction, environmental concern, social effects. , mental norms and the theory of planned behavior.
Bakogiannis, E., Siti, M., Tsigdinos, S., Vassi, A., & Nikitas, A. (2019). Monitoring the first dockless bike sharing system in Greece: Understanding user perceptions, usage patterns and adoption barriers. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 33, 100432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100432
Barbour, N., Zhang, Y., & Mannering, F. (2019). A statistical analysis of bike sharing usage and its potential as an auto-trip substitute. Journal of Transport & Health, 12, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.02.004
Bekiroğlu, D., & Güllühan, N. Ü. (2022). Trends of thinking skills in social studies and life studies courses: A meta-synthesis study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101099
Campbell, A. A., Cherry, C. R., Ryerson, M. S., & Yang, X. (2016). Factors influencing the choice of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Beijing. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.03.004
Chen, S.-Y. (2016). Using the sustainable modified TAM and TPB to analyze the effects of perceived green value on loyalty to a public bike system. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.008
Chen, S.-Y., & Lu, C.-C. (2016). A Model of Green Acceptance and Intentions to Use Bike-Sharing: YouBike Users in Taiwan. Networks and Spatial Economics, 16(4), 1103–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-015-9312-8
Cheng, P., OuYang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2019). Understanding bike sharing use over time by employing extended technology continuance theory. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124, 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.013
Chevalier, A., Charlemagne, M., & Xu, L. (2019). Bicycle acceptance on campus: Influence of the built environment and shared bikes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76, 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.011
Chopdar, P. K., Lytras, M. D., & Visvizi, A. (2022). Exploring factors influencing bicycle-sharing adoption in India: A UTAUT 2 based mixed-method approach. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-06-2021-0862
Eren, E., & Uz, V. E. (2020). A review on bike-sharing: The factors affecting bike-sharing demand. Sustainable Cities and Society, 54, 101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882
Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N., & Watson, A. (2015). Factors influencing bike share membership: An analysis of Melbourne and Brisbane. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 71, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.021
Gao, S., Li, Y., & Guo, H. (2019). Understanding the adoption of bike sharing systems: By combining technology diffusion theories and perceived risk. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10(3), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-08-2018-0089
Halvadia, N. B., Bhatt, K., Sharma, M., Sharma, A., & Dash, S. (2022). Consumers’ intention to use bicycle-sharing services: The role of consumer consciousness. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 7, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100076
Hareket, E., & Kartal, A. (2021). An overview of research on children’s rights in primary school: A meta synthesis. Children and Youth Services Review, 131, 106286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106286
Hazen, B., Overstreet, R., & Wang, Y. (2015). Predicting Public Bicycle Adoption Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability, 7(11), 14558–14573. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71114558
Irawan, M. Z., Bastarianto, F. F., & Priyanto, S. (2022). Using an integrated model of TPB and TAM to analyze the pandemic impacts on the intention to use bicycles in the post-COVID-19 period. IATSS Research, 46(3), 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2022.05.001
Jahanshahi, D., Tabibi, Z., & van Wee, B. (2020). Factors influencing the acceptance and use of a bicycle sharing system: Applying an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(4), 1212–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.08.002
Jahanshahi, D., van Wee, B., & Kharazmi, O. A. (2019). Investigating factors affecting bicycle sharing system acceptability in a developing country: The case of Mashhad, Iran. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.03.002
Jamšek, S., & Culiberg, B. (2020). Introducing a three‐tier sustainability framework to examine bike‐sharing system use: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12553
Ji, W., Lu, C., Mao, J., Liu, Y., Hou, M., & Pan, X. (2021). Public’s Intention and Influencing Factors of Dockless Bike-Sharing in Central Urban Areas: A Case Study of Lanzhou City, China. Sustainability, 13(16), 9265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169265
Li, R., Krishna Sinniah, G., & Li, X. (2022). The Factors Influencing Resident’s Intentions on E-Bike Sharing Usage in China. Sustainability, 14(9), 5013. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095013
Lu, D., Lai, I., & Liu, Y. (2019). The Consumer Acceptance of Smart Product-Service Systems in Sharing Economy: The Effects of Perceived Interactivity and Particularity. Sustainability, 11(3), 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030928
Lyu, J., & Zhang, J. (2021). An Empirical Study into Consumer Acceptance of Dockless Bikes Sharing System Based on TAM. Sustainability, 13(4), 1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041831
Maioli, H. C., de Carvalho, R. C., & de Medeiros, D. D. (2019). SERVBIKE: Riding customer satisfaction of bicycle sharing service. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101680
Moro, S. R., Imhof, A. C., Fettermann, D. C., & Cauchick-Miguel, P. A. (2018). Barriers to bicycle sharing systems implementation: Analysis of two unsuccessful PSS. Procedia CIRP, 73, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.312
Morton, C. (2018). Appraising the market for bicycle sharing schemes: Perceived service quality, satisfaction, and behavioural intention in London. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2017.11.003
Nikitas, A. (2018). Understanding bike-sharing acceptability and expected usage patterns in the context of a small city novel to the concept: A story of ‘Greek Drama.’ Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 56, 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.04.022
Pan, L., Xia, Y., Xing, L., Song, Z., & Xu, Y. (2022). Exploring Use Acceptance of Electric Bicycle-Sharing Systems: An Empirical Study Based on PLS-SEM Analysis. Sensors, 22(18), 7057. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22187057
Shaaban, K. (2020). Why Don’t People Ride Bicycles in High-Income Developing Countries, and Can Bike-Sharing Be the Solution? The Case of Qatar. Sustainability, 12(4), 1693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041693
Shao, P., & Liang, J. (2019). An Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Sustainable Use Intention of Urban Shared Bicycles in China. Sustainability, 11(10), 2721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102721
Shao, Z., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020). Influence of service quality in sharing economy: Understanding customers’ continuance intention of bicycle sharing. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 40, 100944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100944
Soltani, A., Allan, A., Anh Nguyen, H., & Berry, S. (2019). Bikesharing experience in the city of Adelaide: Insight from a preliminary study. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.01.001
Soltani, A., Allan, A., Pojani, D., Khalaj, F., & Mehdizadeh, M. (2022). Users and non-users of bikesharing: How do they differ? Transportation Planning and Technology, 45(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2021.2017215
Wahab, S., Hamzah, M., Ye, X., & Hareeah, V. (2020). Bike-sharing acceptance through the lens of the theory of routine mode choice decisions. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 23, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2020.10034382
Wang, N., Tian, H., Zhu, S., & Li, Y. (2022). Analysis of public acceptance of electric vehicle charging scheduling based on the technology acceptance model. Energy, 258, 124804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124804
Wang, Y., Douglas, M. A., Hazen, B. T., & Dresner, M. (2018). Be green and clearly be seen: How consumer values and attitudes affect adoption of bicycle sharing. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.043
Wicaksono, S., Lin, X., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2022). Market potential of bicycle crowdshipping: A two-sided acceptance analysis. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 45, 100660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100660
Wu, R., Wu, Z., Wen, J., Cai, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations as predictors of bicycle sharing usage intention: An empirical study for Tianjin, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.016
Xin, Z., Liang, M., Zhanyou, W., & Hua, X. (2019). Psychosocial factors influencing shared bicycle travel choices among Chinese: An application of theory planned behavior. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0210964. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210964
Yao, Y., Liu, L., Guo, Z., Liu, Z., & Zhou, H. (2018). Experimental Study on Shared Bike Use Behavior under Bounded Rational Theory and Credit Supervision Mechanism. Sustainability, 11(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010127
Zhanyou, W., Dongmei, H., & Yaopei, Z. (2020). How to improve users’ intentions to continued usage of shared bicycles: A mixed method approach. PLOS ONE, 15(2), e0229458. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229458
Chevalier, A., Charlemagne, M., & Xu, L. (2019). Bicycle acceptance on campus: Influence of the built environment and shared bikes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76, 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.011
Halvadia, N. B., Bhatt, K., Sharma, M., Sharma, A., & Dash, S. (2022). Consumers’ intention to use bicycle-sharing services: The role of consumer consciousness. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 7, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100076
Irawan, M. Z., Bastarianto, F. F., & Priyanto, S. (2022). Using an integrated model of TPB and TAM to analyze the pandemic impacts on the intention to use bicycles in the post-COVID-19 period. IATSS Research, 46(3), 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2022.05.001
Jahanshahi, D., van Wee, B., & Kharazmi, O. A. (2019). Investigating factors affecting bicycle sharing system acceptability in a developing country: The case of Mashhad, Iran. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.03.002
Nikitas, A. (2018). Understanding bike-sharing acceptability and expected usage patterns in the context of a small city novel to the concept: A story of ‘Greek Drama.’ Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 56, 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.04.022
Pan, L., Xia, Y., Xing, L., Song, Z., & Xu, Y. (2022). Exploring Use Acceptance of Electric Bicycle-Sharing Systems: An Empirical Study Based on PLS-SEM Analysis. Sensors, 22(18), 7057. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22187057
Shaaban, K. (2020). Why Don’t People Ride Bicycles in High-Income Developing Countries, and Can Bike-Sharing Be the Solution? The Case of Qatar. Sustainability, 12(4), 1693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041693
Wahab, S., Hamzah, M., Ye, X., & Hareeah, V. (2020). Bike-sharing acceptance through the lens of the theory of routine mode choice decisions. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 23, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2020.10034382
Wicaksono, S., Lin, X., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2022). Market potential of bicycle crowdshipping: A two-sided acceptance analysis. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 45, 100660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100660
Wu, R., Wu, Z., Wen, J., Cai, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations as predictors of bicycle sharing usage intention: An empirical study for Tianjin, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.016
soltani, A., & Khanizadeh, M. A. (2023). Identifying Effective Criteria for Promoting Citizens to Accept and Use Shared Bicycle Systems in the World. Quarterly Journal of Transportation Engineering, 15(2), 3527-3547. doi: 10.22119/jte.2023.355460.2612
MLA
ali soltani; Mohammad Ali Khanizadeh. "Identifying Effective Criteria for Promoting Citizens to Accept and Use Shared Bicycle Systems in the World". Quarterly Journal of Transportation Engineering, 15, 2, 2023, 3527-3547. doi: 10.22119/jte.2023.355460.2612
HARVARD
soltani, A., Khanizadeh, M. A. (2023). 'Identifying Effective Criteria for Promoting Citizens to Accept and Use Shared Bicycle Systems in the World', Quarterly Journal of Transportation Engineering, 15(2), pp. 3527-3547. doi: 10.22119/jte.2023.355460.2612
VANCOUVER
soltani, A., Khanizadeh, M. A. Identifying Effective Criteria for Promoting Citizens to Accept and Use Shared Bicycle Systems in the World. Quarterly Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2023; 15(2): 3527-3547. doi: 10.22119/jte.2023.355460.2612
)